我有这个类：

public class MySerializableClass
{
    public List<MyObject> MyList { get; set; }
}

如果MYLIST是当MySerializableClass序列化空，我需要把它空时，它的deserialised太多，但XmlSerializer的总是初始化它时，它deserialises我的课。

If MyList is null when MySerializableClass is serialized, I need to have it null when it's deserialised too, but the XmlSerializer always initializes it when it deserialises my class.

有没有办法来避免它初始化为空的属性？

Is there a way to avoid it initializing null properties?

MYLIST甚至没有记录在序列化的文件时，它的空。当我和空值加载它，并再次保存它，MYLIST不是空了，它的序列化作为一个名单，LT;> 0的物品，但不能为null

MyList is not even recorded in the serialized file when it's null. When I load it with null values, and save it again, MyList is not null anymore, it's serialized as a List<> with 0 items, but not null.

感谢。

更多信息：

这是IsDeserializing财产是不可行的，由于在类的构造一些code限制

An IsDeserializing property is not viable due to some code restrictions in the structure of the class

推荐答案

这看起来像一个错误...

This looks like a bug...

即使你尝试标记属性作为空，它似乎并没有工作。

Even if you try to mark the property as nullable, it doesn't seem to work.

[XmlArray(IsNullable = true)]
public List<MyObject> MyList { get; set; }

它系列化MYLIST属性如下：

It serializes the MyList property as follows :

<MyList xsi:nil="true" />

所以XML清楚地表明，该列表是空的，但反序列化后，它仍然初始化为空列表...

So the XML clearly indicates that the list is null, but after deserialization, it is still initialized to an empty list...

如果您更换名单，其中，为MyObject＆GT; 与为MyObject [] ，它工作正常（即使没有 ISNULLABLE = TRUE ），但它可能不是你想要的......

If you replace List<MyObject> with MyObject[], it works fine (even without IsNullable = true), but it's probably not what you want...

您或许应该报告这一对连接。

You should probably report this on Connect.