假设我有以下代码

data.stream()
    .map(x -> {
        Object a = maybeReturnsNull(x);
        return a == null ? defaultValue : a;
    })

我有一些可能返回 null 的函数，我将它应用到流的一个元素.然后，我想确保将任何 null 结果更改为某个默认值.与使用前面定义辅助变量 a 并在 lambda 表达式中使用代码块的示例相比，使用以下示例中的两个映射之间是否有任何显着差异?

I have some function that might be returning null, and I'm applying it to an element of the stream. I then want to make sure that any null results get changed to some default value instead. Is there any significant difference between using two maps as in the following example, as compared to using the previous example that defines a helper variable a and uses a code block in the lambda expression?

data.stream()
    .map(x -> maybeReturnsNull(x))
    .map(x -> x == null ? defaultValue : x)

是否有关于在何处避免使用带有 lambda 函数的块语句的标准?

Is there a standard on where or not to avoid using block statements with lambda functions?

推荐答案

两者都可以.选择对您来说更具可读性的一个.如果计算自然分解，就像这个一样，那么多张地图可能更具可读性.有些计算不会自然分解，在这种情况下，你会被困在前者.在这两种情况下，您都不应该担心其中一种性能明显优于另一种；这在很大程度上是不考虑的.

Either is fine. Pick the one that seems more readable to you. If the calculation naturally decomposes, as this one does, then the multiple maps is probably more readable. Some calculations won't naturally decompose, in which case you're stuck at the former. In neither case should you be worrying that one is significantly more performant than the other; that's largely a non-consideration.