目前,我有code褪色亮度的调整,看起来是这样的:
At the moment I have code to fade brightness adjustments which looks something like this:
new Thread() {
public void run() {
for (int i = initial; i < target; i++) {
final int bright = i;
handle.post(new Runnable() {
public void run() {
float currentBright = bright / 100f;
window.getAttributes().screenBrightness = currentBright;
window.setAttributes(window.getAttributes());
});
}
try {
sleep(step);
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
}
}.start();
我不知道这是考虑好方法(我认为使用AsyncTask的,但我看不出在这种情况下,福利)。有没有更好的方式来实现背光衰落?
I'm not sure if that's considered good methodology (I considered using ASyncTask, but I can't see the benefits in this case). Is there a better way to achieve backlight fading?
编辑:我现在用的是TimerTask的如下:
I'm now using a TimerTask as follows:
new Timer().schedule(new TimerTask() {
@Override
public void run() {
final float currentBright = counter[0] / 100f;
handle.post(new Runnable() {
public void run() {
window.getAttributes().screenBrightness = currentBright;
window.setAttributes(window.getAttributes());
if (++counter[0] <= target) {
cancel();
}
}
});
}
}, 0, step);
我使用一个数组计数器的原因是因为它需要最后
将在 Runnable接口访问
,但我需要修改值。它会占用CPU少,但仍比我更喜欢。
The reason I use an array for the counter is because it needs to be final
to be accessed in the Runnable
, but I need to modify the value. This uses less CPU, but still more than I like.
EDIT2:Aaaand第三次尝试。感谢CommonsWare您的意见! (我希望我正确地运用它!)
Aaaand a third attempt. Thanks to CommonsWare for the advice! (I hope I applied it correctly!)
handle.post(new Runnable() {
public void run() {
if (counter[0] < target) {
final float currentBright = counter[0] / 100f;
window.getAttributes().screenBrightness = currentBright;
window.setAttributes(window.getAttributes());
counter[0]++;
handle.postDelayed(this, step);
}
}
});
谢谢!
怎么样降低亮度的一半在每个迭代。
how about reducing the brightness to half in each iteration.
然后循环将在O(log n)的,而不是为O(n)完成当前的解决方案。
Then loop will complete in O(log n) rather than O(n) in current solution.