我刚才注意到一个多维数组在C#中,不执行的IEnumerable< T>
,而它确实实现的IEnumerable
。对于一维数组,无论是的IEnumerable< T>
和的IEnumerable
的实施。
I have just noticed that a multidimensional array in C#, does not implement IEnumerable<T>
, while it does implement IEnumerable
. For single-dimensional arrays, both IEnumerable<T>
and IEnumerable
are implemented.
为什么这种差异?如果一个多维数组是的IEnumerable
,当然它也应该实现通用版本?我注意到这一点,因为我想在一个多维数组,除非你使用演员LT从而未能使用扩展方法; T&GT;
或类似的;所以我可以肯定看到讨论是否多维数组实施的IEnumerable&LT; T&GT;
Why this difference? If a multi-dimensional array is IEnumerable
, surely it should also implement the generic version? I noticed this because I tried to use an Extension method on a multidimensional array, which fails unless you use Cast<T>
or similar; so I can definitely see the an argument for making multidimensional arrays implement IEnumerable<T>
.
要澄清我在code的问题,我希望下面的code打印真
的四倍,而它实际打印真
,假
,真
,真
:
To clarify my question in code, I would expect the following code to print true
four times, while it actually prints true
, false
, true
, true
:
int[] singleDimensionArray = new int[10];
int[,] multiDimensional = new int[10, 10];
Debug.WriteLine(singleDimensionArray is IEnumerable<int>);
Debug.WriteLine(multiDimensional is IEnumerable<int>);
Debug.WriteLine(singleDimensionArray is IEnumerable);
Debug.WriteLine(multiDimensional is IEnumerable);
的CLR有阵列的两种不同类型:载体的这保证是一维具有下界0,和其可具有非零边界和秩0以外更一般的阵列
The CLR has two different kinds of arrays: vectors which are guaranteed to be one-dimensional with a lower bound of 0, and more general arrays which can have non-zero bounds and a rank other than 0.
在CLI规范第8.9.1:
From section 8.9.1 of the CLI spec:
此外,一个创建的载体
元素类型T,实现了
接口
System.Collections.Generic.IList&LT; U&GT;
(§8.7),其中U:= T
Additionally, a created vector with
element type T, implements the
interface
System.Collections.Generic.IList<U>
(§8.7), where U := T.
我不得不说,这似乎pretty的怪我。由于它已经实现了的IEnumerable
我不明白为什么它不应该执行的IEnumerable&LT; T&GT;
。它不会作出太大的意义落实的IList&LT; T&GT;
,但简单的通用接口就可以了。
I have to say it seems pretty weird to me. Given that it already implements IEnumerable
I don't see why it shouldn't implement IEnumerable<T>
. It wouldn't make as much sense to implement IList<T>
, but the simple generic interface would be fine.
如果你想这样,你既可以调用演员LT; T&GT;
(如果你使用.NET 3.5)或写你自己的方法来遍历数组。为了避免铸造你必须编写其中发现每个维度的下限/上限,并取东西,这样你自己的方法。并不十分愉快的。
If you want this, you could either call Cast<T>
(if you're using .NET 3.5) or write your own method to iterate through the array. To avoid casting you'd have to write your own method which found the lower/upper bounds of each dimension, and fetched things that way. Not terribly pleasant.