套接字超时使得使用DefaultHTTPClient HTTPGET请求时DefaultHTTPClient、HTTPGET

2023-09-06 04:36:52 作者:℡稚嫩的少年.。

有哪些优点和缺点背后重用 DefaultHTTPClient 从Android应用程序发送HTTP请求时到外部服务器?我试图用重复使用 DefaultHTTPClient 制作时,周期性 HTTPGET 的要求,但我得到随机插座超时(特别是使用3G的时候)

What are the pros and cons behind reusing DefaultHTTPClient when sending HTTP requests from an Android app to an external server? I tried using reusing a DefaultHTTPClient when making periodic HTTPGet requests, but I get random socket timeouts (specially when using 3G).

我的code看起来如下:

My code looks like follows:

public class MyHTTPSender {
  private DefaultHTTPClient mClient;

  public MyHTTPSender() {
    mClient = new DefaultHTTPClient();
  }

  public void send(String httpAddress) {
HttpGet get = new HttpGet(this.surrogateURL);
    HttpResponse response = null;
try {
      response = httpClient.execute(get);
      // ... consume entity if OK          
    } catch (Exception e) {
    } finally {
        if (response != null) {
           // do some sanity checks to ensure Entity is there!
           response.getEntity().consumeContent();
        }
    }
  }
}

我看不出什么问题,我在做什么。我有一个单独的处理程序,使HTTPPost请求,并且工作得很好(使用不同的DefaultHTTPClient对象)。

I can't see anything wrong with what I am doing. I have a separate handler that make HTTPPost requests, and that works perfectly well (uses a different DefaultHTTPClient object).

有什么建议?

推荐答案

什么API级别是你吗?

What API level are you on?

如果你是在8级以上,你可能会考虑尝试 AndroidHttpClient < /一>,它可以指定一个较好的插座超时。

If you're on 8 or above you might consider trying AndroidHttpClient, which may have a better socket timeouts specified.

否则,你可能会检查你如何创建 DefaultHttpClient 并尝试指定更长的超时。

Otherwise, you might examine how you're creating the DefaultHttpClient and try specifying longer timeouts.