对于任何X类继承自类Y,新名单,其中,X>()为IEnumerable的< Y>
是真实的。但是,这并不持有的结构:新名单,其中,INT>()为IEnumerable的<值类型>
是假的。我的问题是:为什么?
For any class X that inherits from class Y, new List<X>() is IEnumerable<Y>
is true. However, this doesn't hold for structs: new List<int>() is IEnumerable<ValueType>
is false. My question is: Why?
下面是一个简单的程序:
Here is a sample program:
class Program
{
class Y { }
class X : Y { }
struct Z { }
static void Main(string[] args)
{
Test(new List<X>());
Test(new List<string>());
Test(new List<Z>());
Test(new List<int>());
Test("blah");
Test(1);
Console.ReadLine();
}
static void Test(object o)
{
if (o is IEnumerable<Y>)
{
Console.WriteLine(o + " is a list of Ys");
}
else if (o is IEnumerable<ValueType>)
{
Console.WriteLine(o + " is a list of ValueTypes");
}
else if (o is IEnumerable<object>)
{
Console.WriteLine(o + " is a list of objects");
}
else if (o is System.Collections.IEnumerable)
{
Console.WriteLine(o + " is most likely a list of ValueTypes or a string");
}
else
{
Console.WriteLine(o + " is not a list");
}
}
}
输出:
System.Collections.Generic.List`1 [ConsoleApplication1.Program + X]是伊苏名单
System.Collections.Generic.List`1[ConsoleApplication1.Program+X] is a list of Ys
System.Collections.Generic.List`1 [System.String]为对象的列表
System.Collections.Generic.List`1[System.String] is a list of objects
System.Collections.Generic.List`1 [ConsoleApplication1.Program + Z]是最有可能的值类型的列表或字符串
System.Collections.Generic.List`1[ConsoleApplication1.Program+Z] is most likely a list of ValueTypes or a string
System.Collections.Generic.List`1 [System.Int32的]是最有可能的值类型或列表的字符串
System.Collections.Generic.List`1[System.Int32] is most likely a list of ValueTypes or a string
等等是最有可能的值类型的列表或字符串
blah is most likely a list of ValueTypes or a string
1是不是列表
那么,为什么新名单,其中,INT&GT;
不是的IEnumerable&LT;值类型&GT;
协方差仅适用于引用类型,而不是值类型。因此,一个名单,其中,串&GT;
是分配给的IEnumerable&LT;对象&gt;
,因为字符串
是引用类型,但名单,其中,INT&GT;
不是分配给的IEnumerable&LT;值类型&GT;
。见的C#语言规范的细节部分13.1.3.2
Covariance works only for reference types, not for value types. So a List<string>
is assignable to an IEnumerable<object>
because string
is a reference type, but a List<int>
is not assignable to an IEnumerable<ValueType>
. See section 13.1.3.2 of the C# language specifications for details
下一篇:安卓:Parcelable.writeToParcel和Parcelable.Creator.createFromParcel从来不被称为被称为、从来不、writeToParcel、Parcelabl