什么是在标准模式在.NET事件委托的意义呢？即该事件处理程序predefined委托？为什么不选择最合适的签名要求？

What's the point in the standard pattern for event delegates in .net? I.e. the EventHandler predefined delegate? Why not just choose the most appropriate signature for the requirement?

编辑：，此外，是否有必要亦步亦趋地跟着微软的例子在所有情况下

And furthermore, is it necessary to slavishly follow Microsoft's example in all cases?

推荐答案

这是主要的一致性和版本，与发件人 paramater一如既往System.Object的和的args 参数一如既往一个System.EventArgs或dervied其类，你可以改变传递给它的寄件人参数以及改变EventArgs的类型后不会破坏任何现有的$ C $ ℃。

It's mainly for consistency and versioning—with the sender paramater as always System.Object and the args parameter as always a System.EventArgs, or a dervied class thereof, you can change the sender argument passed to it as well as change the EventArgs type afterwards without breaking any existing code.

整个.NET三项赛成语被设计为支持基于组件的开发，其中调用code是没有根据的部件与事件开发商的控制权。

The whole .NET eventing idiom was designed to support component-based development, where the calling code is not under control of the developer of the component with the events.