我有，我想在不同的线程上运行两个功能（因为它们是数据库的东西，和他们没有立即需要的）。

I have two functions that I want to run on different threads (because they're database stuff, and they're not needed immediately).

的功能是：

            getTenantReciept_UnitTableAdapter1.Fill(rentalEaseDataSet1.GetTenantReciept_Unit);
            getTenantReciept_TenantNameTableAdapter1.Fill(rentalEaseDataSet1.GetTenantReciept_TenantName);

在JavaScript中，我知道我可以创建创建一个匿名函数，并像这样把它在一个新的线程很容易：

In javascript, I know I can create create an anonymous function and call it on a new thread quite easily with something like this:

setTimeout(new function(){doSomethingImportantInBackground();}, 500);

有没有这样的事情在C＃？

Is there something like this in C#?

推荐答案

你的问题不是很清楚，我怕。您可以轻松地开始与一些code一个新的线程，使用匿名方法在C＃2，和lambda EX pressions在C＃3：

Your question isn't very clear, I'm afraid. You can easily start a new thread with some code, using anonymous methods in C# 2, and lambda expressions in C# 3:

匿名方式：

new Thread(delegate() {
    getTenantReciept_UnitTableAdapter1.Fill(
        rentalEaseDataSet1.GetTenantReciept_Unit);
}).Start();
new Thread(delegate() {
    getTenantReciept_TenantNameTableAdapter1.Fill(
        rentalEaseDataSet1.GetTenantReciept_TenantName);
}).Start();

LAMBDA EX pression：

Lambda expression:

new Thread(() =>
    getTenantReciept_UnitTableAdapter1.Fill(
        rentalEaseDataSet1.GetTenantReciept_Unit)
).Start();
new Thread(() =>
    getTenantReciept_TenantNameTableAdapter1.Fill(
        rentalEaseDataSet1.GetTenantReciept_TenantName)
).Start();

您可以使用相同的语法为 Control.Invoke ，但是它稍微复杂一些的，可以采取的任意的委托 - 所以你需要告诉你正在使用，而不是依赖于隐式转换而键入编译器。这可能是最简单的写：

You can use the same sort of syntax for Control.Invoke, but it's slightly trickier as that can take any delegate - so you need to tell the compiler which type you're using rather than rely on an implicit conversion. It's probably easiest to write:

EventHandler eh = delegate
{
    // Code
};
control.Invoke(eh);

或

EventHandler eh = (sender, args) =>
{
    // Code
};
control.Invoke(eh);

作为一个侧面说明，是你的名字是那么长？可以缩短他们获得更多的可读性code？

As a side note, are your names really that long? Can you shorten them to get more readable code?