何时选择AesCryptoServiceProvider超过AesManaged或RijndaelManaged的?AesCryptoServiceProvider、AesManaged、Rijnda

2023-09-03 03:32:55 作者:曾经已是曾经

我觉得区别因素是

AesCryptoServiceProvider是符合FIPS AesManaged是跨平台的,需要.NET 3.0 在RijndaelManaged的运行于.NET 2.0,需要限制块大小

是基本正确?

推荐答案

的 AesManaged文档指出

AES算法在本质上是Rijndael的对称算法有一个固定的块大小和迭代次数。这类功能的方式相同RijndaelManaged类但限制块为128位和不允许反馈模式。

"The AES algorithm is essentially the Rijndael symmetric algorithm with a fixed block size and iteration count. This class functions the same way as the RijndaelManaged class but limits blocks to 128 bits and does not allow feedback modes."

这会建议其使用ECB(电子codebook)模式。这可以是一个显著弱点对加密数据,因为它意味着纯文本数据的相同电路块会导致密输出的相同电路块。

That would suggest its using ECB (Electronic Codebook) mode. This can be a significant weakness to the encrypted data as it means identical blocks of plain text data will result in identical blocks of cipher output.

编辑:(截至校正) 为模式属性指示模式INFACT默认为CBC(这容易混淆的是反馈模式),但不能设置为CFB或OFB(加密反馈/输出反馈)

(As correction) Documentation for the Mode property indicates that Mode infact defaults to CBC (which confusingly IS a feedback mode) but cannot be set to CFB or OFB (Cipher Feedback / Output Feedback)

 
精彩推荐
图片推荐