我使用的BinaryFormatter 序列化的类的对象 A 存储在系统::收藏集::通用::名单＆LT; A ^＆GT; ^ 。我已经添加了 [Serializable接口] 标签，并在课堂上实施 ISerializable的 A （均 GetObjectData使用和特殊的构造函数）。反序列化时，我发现列表进行反序列化，并包含内容的相同数目的连载。然而，这些元素为空引用。

I am using BinaryFormatter to serialize a collection of objects of class A stored in a System::Collections::Generic::List<A^>^. I have added the [Serializable] tag and have implemented ISerializable in class A (both GetObjectData and the special constructor). When deserializing, I find that the list is deserialized and contains the same number of elements as was serialized. However, each of these elements is a null reference.

我已经检查抛出的异常，并相信这是不是这样的。我已经检查，以确保其形式为 A（SerializationInfo中^信息，的StreamingContext上下文）的特殊构造被称为正确的次数反序列化过程，但这些重新构造的对象没有的从反序列化的集合被引用。

I've checked for thrown exceptions and am sure that it is not the case. I have checked to ensure that the special constructor of the form A(SerializationInfo ^info, StreamingContext context) is called the correct number of times during deserialization but these re-constructed objects are not being referenced from the deserialized collection.

我也换成了系统::收藏集::通用::名单＆LT; A ^＆GT; ^ 与阵列＆LT; A ^＆GT; ^ ，我仍然得到同样的结果。阵列具有元素的正确数目，但每个元素是一个空引用

I also replaced the System::Collections::Generic::List<A^>^ with array<A^>^ and I'm still getting the same results. The array has the correct number of elements but each element is a null reference.

任何人谁见过类似的问题？任何线索？

Anyone who has seen a similar problem? Any clues?

推荐答案

但问题是，任何对象称为子对象中不必被完全之后立即的GetValue 通话。在我的情况下，普通的列表尚未完全反序列化，因此只包含空引用。我终于用 IDeserializationCallback 执行code后，对象图已被完全反序列化。